Performance Evaluation of Selected Cement Companies in India through Value Added Statements

Rathod Anjali K; Dadhaniya  Abhisha C

doi:10.56209/jommerce.v2i3.34

Authors

Rathod Anjali K Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Saurashtra University, Rajkot-360005, Gujarat, India
Dadhaniya Abhisha C Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Saurashtra University, Rajkot-360005, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56209/jommerce.v2i3.34

Keywords:

Value Added Statement, Gross Value Added, Net Value-Added, Value-Added Ratios, Cement Industry

Abstract

Directors have turned their consideration to the way of increasing the value of their companies. And for that one of the major goals for higher authority of financial management is to do maximum utilization of the capital employed. This study gives an importance to the performance evaluation through value added statements of selected cement companies. This study is done to prepare and analyze value added statements and also compare the value-added ratios of selected cement companies in India. This secondary data-based study selects two cement companies as samples by using simple random sampling method of probability sampling from NSE and BSE listed cement companies. In this study ratio analysis as an accounting tool is used in which five value added ratios are selected and T-test technique of parametric test as statistical tool is used to identify the difference between samples mean. As per the result of the value-added statements it is found that value created by Ultratech Cement Ltd. was higher than Ambuja Cement Ltd. during this study period. As per the result of T test it can be said that the performance of both the companies are equal in performing ratios excluding Government share to net value added ratio and Capital provider to net value added ratio. The overall conclusion can be made on the basis of value-added ratios that during these five years the performance of Ultratech Cement Ltd. was better than Ambuja Cement Ltd.

References

Abhisha, D. C., & Anjali, R. K. (2022). Performance Evaluation of Selected Food Processing Companies through Value Added Statements. Journal of Social Commerce, 2(2), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.56209/jommerce.v2i2.15

Akhtar, A., & Sarmah, A. K. (2018). Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: A global perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 262-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.085

Ayub, Y., Mehmood, A., Ren, J., & Lee, C. K. (2022). Sustainable recycling of poultry litter to value-added products in developing countries of South Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, 132029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132029

Baidya, R., & Ghosh, S. K. (2019). Low carbon cement manufacturing in India by co-processing of alternative fuel and raw materials. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 41(21), 2561-2572. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1555630

Ghafoorpoor Yazdi, P., Azizi, A., & Hashemipour, M. (2018). An empirical investigation of the relationship between overall equipment efficiency (OEE) and manufacturing sustainability in industry 4.0 with time study approach. Sustainability, 10(9), 3031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093031

Hossain, M. A. (2017). Value Added Statement: A Part of Social Responsibility Reporting. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20170502.11

Idris, N., Talib, O., & Razali, F. (2022). Strategies in Mastering Science Process Skills in Science Experiments: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.32969

MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility information in annual reports in the EU—A Czech case study. Sustainability, 11(1), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010237

Mandal, N., & Goswami, S. (2008). Value added statement (VAS)–A critical Analysis. Great Lakes Herald, 2(3), 98-120.

Meshram, R. B., & Kumar, S. (2022). Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of geopolymer cement manufacturing with Portland cement in Indian context. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(6), 4791-4802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03336-9

Narkhede, B. E. (2017). Advance manufacturing strategy and firm performance: An empirical study in a developing environment of small-and medium-sized firms. International Journal, 24(1), 62-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2015-0053

Nasim, A., & Solihati, S. Y. (2019, May). Comparison Analysis of Sharia Banking Financial Performance Using Income Statement Approach and Value Added Statement Approach. In 1st International Conference on Economics, Business, Entrepreneurship, and Finance (ICEBEF 2018) (pp. 85-87). Atlantis Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icebef-18.2019.20

Nassif, A., Bresser-Pereira, L. C., & Feijo, C. (2018). The case for reindustrialisation in developing countries: towards the connection between the macroeconomic regime and the industrial policy in Brazil. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(2), 355-381. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex028

Pelaez-Verdet, A., & Loscertales-Sanchez, P. (2021). Key ratios for long-term prediction of hotel financial distress and corporate default: survival analysis for an economic stagnation. Sustainability, 13(3), 1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031473

Quanbeck, A., Johnson, R. A., Saha-Muldowney, M., Resnik, F., Hirschfield, S., Meline, R. R., & Mahoney, J. E. (2021). Encouraging the scale-up of proven interventions: Infrastructure development for the “Evidence-to-Implementation” award. Journal of clinical and translational science, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.828

Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues and instruments development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000403

Rossini, M., Costa, F., Tortorella, G. L., & Portioli-Staudacher, A. (2019). The interrelation between Industry 4.0 and lean production: an empirical study on European manufacturers. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 102(9), 3963-3976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03441-7

Sahoo, B. B., & Pramanik, A. K. (2017). Value Added: Technique for Corporate Performance Measurement under Social Perspective. KINERJA, 21(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v21i1.1038

Sharma, S., & Lenka, U. (2018). Value-added statement as a trigger to organizational unlearning. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-02-2018-0021

Sledgianowski, D., Gomaa, M., & Tan, C. (2017). Toward integration of Big Data, technology and information systems competencies into the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education, 38, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.12.008

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Ting, I. W. K., Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., & Ren, C. (2021). Value-added intellectual capital and productive efficiencies: evidence from Taiwan listed electronics companies. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-11-2020-1374

Yamtinah, S., Masykuri, M., Ashadi, & Shidiq, A. S. (2017, August). Gender differences in students’ attitudes toward science: An analysis of students’ science process skill using testlet instrument. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1868, No. 1, p. 030003). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995102

Yogesha, B. S., & Mahadevappa, B. (2014). Analysis of value added ratios of indian oil corporation ltd. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 19(1), 18-25.

Zaidan, H., Hijleh, H. A., Mawali, H. A., Natour, A. R. A., & Al-Okaily, M. (2021, September). Influence of Liquidity, Solvency on Banks’ Profitability: The Moderating Role of Net Revenues. In The International Conference On Global Economic Revolutions (pp. 149-164). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93464-4_16