The Impact of Auditor Time Budgeting Pressure on Fraud Detection Determinants

Linda Fransisca; Wahidahwati Wahidahwati; Titik  Mildawati

doi:10.56209/jommerce.v5i3.180

Authors

Linda Fransisca Indonesian College of Economics (STIESIA) Surabaya
Wahidahwati Indonesian College of Economics (STIESIA) Surabaya
Titik Mildawati Indonesian College of Economics (STIESIA) Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56209/jommerce.v5i3.180

Keywords:

Professional skepticism, Auditor competence, Auditor experience, Time budget pressure, Fraud detection ability

Abstract

This research examines the effect of professional skepticism, auditor competence, auditor experience, and time budget pressure on fraud detection ability and the impact of professional skepticism, auditor competence, and auditor experience on fraud detection ability with time budget pressure as a moderating variable. Furthermore, the research applies quantitatively with an explanatory approach. The data were primary, in the form of questionnaires. The variables were professional skepticism, auditor competence, auditor experience, time budget pressure, and fraud detection ability. Moreover, the respondents consist of auditors in KAP of East Java. The data analysis technique used moderated regression. As a result, it concludes that professional skepticism, auditor competence, auditor experience, and time budget pressure are proven partially on the fraud detection ability. Also, it moderates successfully the effect of professional skepticism, auditor competence, and auditor experience on fraud detection ability. Therefore, the results are used as an implication for auditors to increase professional skepticism, auditor competence, and auditor experience to improve fraud detection ability. In addition, KAP has to manage budget pressure well and control its policy which is not only oriented on time efficiency, but also audit quality.

References

Adisti, M. I., & Setyohadi, J. S. (2019). Pengaruh Independensi, Kompetensi dan Pengalaman Kerja Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Sosio e-kons, 11(1), 37-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sosioekons.v11i1.3246

Agusti, R., & Pertiwi, N. P. (2013). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi dan profesionalisme terhadap kualitas audit (studi empiris pada kantor akuntan publik se sumatera). Jurnal ekonomi, 21(03).

Akmalia, I., & Ariani, N. E. (2022). Pengaruh teknik audit berbantuan komputer (TABK), integritas, dan kompetensi auditor terhadap kualitas audit BPK RI Perwakilan Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 7(1), 34–44.

Alim, M. N., Hapsari, T., & Liliek, P. (2007). Pengaruh kompetensi dan independensi terhadap kualitas audit dengan etika auditor sebagai variabel moderasi. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.

Alnoprika, M., Zirman, & Anisma, Y. (2015). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, dan profesionalisme auditor terhadap kinerja auditor dengan etika profesi sebagai variabel moderating (Studi pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Pekanbaru, Batam, dan Medan). JOM Fekon, 2(1).

Anderson, U. L., Head, M. J., Ramamoorti, S., Riddle, C., Salamasick, M., & Sobel, P. J. (2017). Internal auditing: Assurance & advisory services (4th ed.). The Internal Audit Foundation.

Andriani, N., & Nursiam, N. (2018). Pengaruh fee audit, audit tenure, rotasi audit dan reputasi auditor terhadap kualitas audit (Studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2013–2015). Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v3i1.5559

Anggriawan, E. F. (2014). Pengaruh pengalaman kerja, skeptisisme profesional, dan tekanan waktu terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi fraud (Studi empiris pada kantor akuntan publik). Barometer Nominal: Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen Indonesia, 3(2), 101–116.

Asare, S. K., Bennar, A., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2015). Tantangan menghadapi auditor di dalam mendeteksi keuangan pernyataan tipuan: Wawasan dari investigasi tipuan. Jurnal Forensik dan Penyelidikan Akuntansi, 7(2), 63–112. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-19-125

Atmaja, D. (2016). Pengaruh kompetensi, profesionalisme, dan pengalaman audit terhadap kemampuan auditor Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) dalam mendeteksi fraud dengan teknik audit berbantuan komputer (TABK) sebagai variabel moderasi. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v16i1.2078

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

Braun, R. L. (2000). The effect of time pressure on auditor attention to qualitative aspects of misstatements indicative of potential fraudulent financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(3), 243–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00044-6

Coram, P., Ng, J., & Woodliff, D. R. (2001). The effect of time budget pressure and risk of error on auditors’ performance. Australia.

Coram, P., Ng, J., & Woodliff, D. R. (2004). The effect of risk of misstatement on the propensity to commit reduced audit quality acts under time budget pressure. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 159–167.

DeZoort, F. T., & Lord, A. T. (1997). A review and synthesis of pressure effects research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 16, 28–85.

Elfarini, E. C. (2007). Pengaruh kompetensi dan independensi auditor terhadap kualitas audit [Skripsi, Universitas Diponegoro].

Endarto, B., Taufiqurrahman, K., Indriastuty, W., Prasetyo, D. E., Aliyyah, I., Endarti, N., Abadi, E. W., Daim, S., Ismono, N. A., Rusdiyanto, J., & Kalbuana, N. (2021). Global perspective on capital market law development in Indonesia. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24, 1–12.

Faturachman, T. A., & Nugraha, A. (2015). Pengaruh Due Professional Care Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v3i1.6604

Fransisco, F., Indri, P., Rara, R., Rizqi, Z., Zulmanto, & Umar, H. (2019). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, dan tekanan waktu terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan dengan skeptisme profesional sebagai variabel intervening. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pakar, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.25105/pakar.v0i0.4250

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (Edisi ke-9). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gusfiardi, R., Cheisvyanny, C., & Sari, V. F. (2019). Pengaruh kompetensi, profesionalisme, dan pengalaman kerja auditor terhadap kualitas audit internal pada perusahaan swasta dan BUMN di Padang. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 1(4), 1828-1844. http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/jea.v1i4.179

Hafizhah, N., & Abdurahim, A. (2017). Pengaruh tekanan waktu, independensi, skeptisme profesional, dan pengalaman kerja terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan pada laporan keuangan (Studi pada empiris Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Perwakilan Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Reviu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 1(1), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.18196/rab.010107

Hartan, T. N. (2016). Pengaruh skeptisme profesional, independensi, dan kompetensi terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan, Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Haryono Umar, R. B. P. (2021). Audit forensik: lawan korupsi. BUKU DOSEN-2019.

Hassink, H., Meuwissen, R., & Bollen, L. (2010). Fraud detection, redress and reporting by auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(9), 861–881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02686901011080044

Helmiati, H. (2021). Pengaruh Penerapan Aturan Etika, Pengalaman Dan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan. Ensiklopedia Social Review, 3(3), 267-274. https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v3i3.970

Heryanto, P. (2019). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi dan due professional care terhadap kualitas internal audit pada PT OTO Multiartha Jakarta. Akrual, 1(1), 49–64.

Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149

Indriyani, S., & Hakim, L. (2021). Pengaruh pengalaman audit, skeptisme profesional dan time pressure terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance, 1(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.24853/jago.1.2.113-120

Islahuzzaman. (2012). Istilah-istilah akuntansi dan auditing (Edisi 1). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kelley, T., & Margheim, L. (1990). The impact of time budget pressure, personality, and leadership variables on dysfunctional auditor behavior. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(2), 21–42.

Kertarajasa, A. Y., Marwa, T., & Wahyudi, T. (2019). The effect of competence, experience, independence, due professional care, and auditor integrity on audit quality with auditor ethics as moderating variable. Jurnal Akuntansi.

Knapp, C. A., & Knapp, M. C. (2001). The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical procedures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(1), 25–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00005-2

KPMG. (2013). KPMG fraud survey report. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Lismawati, S., Sari, N., & Ismalia, I. (2021). Pengaruh kompetensi, profesionalisme, dan etika auditor terhadap kualitas audit (Studi pada Inspektorat Provinsi Bengkulu). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v9i1.3649

Lola, L., & Munandar, A. (2018). The influence of auditors’ professional skepticism and competence. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 15(1), Artikel 6. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2018.06

Margheim, L., & Pany, K. (1986). Quality control, premature signoff, and underreporting of time: Some empirical findings. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 7(1), 50–63.

Maulina, M., Anggraini, R., & Anwar, C. (2010). Pengaruh tekanan waktu dan tindakan pengawasan terhadap penghentian prematur atas prosedur audit. Makalah dipresentasikan pada Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII, Purwokerto.

McDaniel, L. S. (1990). The effects of time pressure and audit program structure on audit performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491150

Moeller, R. (2016). Brink’s modern internal auditing: A common body of knowledge. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Noviyanti, S. (2008). Skeptisisme profesional auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 5(1), 102–125. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2008.05

Nugrahini, P. (2015). Pengaruh kompetensi dan profesionalisme auditor Internal terhadap kualitas audit (Studi Empiris pada BUMN dan BUMD di Kota Yogyakarta). Skripsi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Nurwahyuni, & Isniawati, A. (2021). Analisis faktor-faktor kemampuan auditor mendeteksi keadaan dengan moderasi etika profesi. Jurnal Bisnis dan Sistem Informasi, 3(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.36067/jbis.v3i2.102

Pangestika, W., Taufeni, T., & Alfiati, S. (2014). Pengaruh keahlian profesional, independensi, dan tekanan anggaran waktu terhadap pendeteksian kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(2), 1–15.

Payne, E. A., & Ramsay, R. J. (2005). Fraud risk assessment and auditors’ professional skepticism. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(3), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510585636

Prasita, A., & Adi, P. H. (2007). Pengaruh kompleksitas audit dan tekanan anggaran waktu terhadap kualitas audit dengan moderasi pemahaman terhadap sistem informasi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 13(1), 54–73.

Pusparani, N., & Wiratmaja, I. D. N. (2020). Pengaruh kompetensi dan independensi auditor pada kualitas audit. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(9), 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2020.v30.i03.p14

Puspitasari, W., Mafela, A., & Melani, F. (2017). [Judul artikel tidak lengkap]. Indonesian Management and Accounting Research, 16(2), 17–32.

Quadackers, L., Groot, T., & Wright, A. (2014). Auditor professional skepticism: Neutrality versus presumptive doubt. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12052

Rahayu, S. K., & Suhayati, E. (2013). Auditing: Konsep dasar dan pedoman pemeriksaan akuntansi (Edisi ke-2). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Rahmina, L. Y., & Agoes, S. (2014). Influence of auditor independence, audit tenure, and audit fee on audit quality of members of capital market accountant forum in Indonesia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.083

Rumengan, I. P. E., & Rahayu, S. (2014). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Pengalaman Kerja Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Skripsi diterbitkan. Universitas Telkom.

Said, L. L., & Munandar, A. (2018). The influence of auditor’s professional skepticism and competence on fraud detection: the role of time budget pressure. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2018.06

Sari, A., & Musyarofah, S. (2020). Effect of audit tools and auditor competence on auditor ability to detect indications of fraud and professional skepticism. In International Colloquium on Forensics Accounting and Governance (ICFAG) (Vol. 1, Issue 1).

Savira, J. A., Rahmawati, R., & Ramadhan, A. (2021). Pengaruh kompetensi dan skeptisme profesional terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 9(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v9i1.435

Sayed Hussin, S. A. H., Iskandar, T. M., Saleh, N. M., & Jaffar, R. (2017). Professional skepticism and auditor assessment of misstatement risk: The moderating effect of experience and time budget pressure. Economics & Sociology, 10(4), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/17

Silalahi, S. P. (2013). Pengaruh etika, kompetensi, pengalaman audit dan situasi audit terhadap skeptisme profesional auditor. Jurnal Ekonomi, 21(03).

Simanjuntak, C., & Farida, T. K. W. A. (2017). Pengaruh rasio keuangan terhadap financial distress (Studi pada perusahaan transportasi yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2011–2015). e-Proceeding of Management, 4(2), 1580. https://doi.org/10.29103/j-mind.v7i1.7459

Sososutikno, C. (2003). Hubungan tekanan anggaran waktu dengan perilaku disfungsional serta pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas audit. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VI, Oktober, 1116–1124.

Srikandi, Y. I. (2015). Pengaruh kompetensi dan skeptisme profesional auditor terhadap pendeteksian kecurangan. Universitas Komputer Indonesia. http://elib.unikom.ac.id/files/disk1/672/jbptunikompp-gdl-yanismanir-33560-2-unikom_2-l.pdf

Suganda, T. R., Ambarwati, S., & Astuti, T. (2018). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional, Independensi, Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Fraud. Liquidity: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 7(1), 19-26.

Suraida, I. (2005). Pengaruh etika, kompetensi, pengalaman audit, dan risiko audit terhadap skeptisisme profesional auditor dan ketepatan pemberian opini akuntan publik. Sosiohumaniora, 7(3), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.32546/lq.v7i1.180

Tandiontong, M. (2016). Kualitas audit dan pengukurannya. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Umar, H. (2017). Corruption the devil. BUKU DOSEN-2016.

Wahidahwati, & Asyik, N. F. (2022). Determinants of auditors’ ability in fraud detection. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2079984

Widiyastuti, M., & Pamudji, S. (2009). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, dan profesionalisme terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan (fraud). Value Added, 5(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.26714/vameb.v5i2.687