Peer Review Process

TechVista Journal of Emerging Information Systems employs a thorough peer review procedure to guarantee the dissemination of high-quality research. This procedure has many essential stages, each designed to rigorously evaluating the submitted manuscripts.

Preliminary Assessment

Each paper submitted to the TechVista Journal of Emerging Information Systems begins with a preliminary assessment by the Editorial Board. During this initial phase, the board evaluates the manuscript to ensure it aligns with the journal's scope and standards. As part of this assessment, a plagiarism test is conducted to verify the originality of the content. If the paper meets these requirements, it progresses to the next stage.

Blind Peer Review

The manuscript then enters the blind peer review phase where each submission will be assigned three reviewers. In this process, the reviewers are provided with the manuscript and are aware of the authors' identities. However, the identity of the reviewers is not disclosed to the authors, ensuring an unbiased evaluation. This blind review process ensures impartiality and fairness, as reviewers assess the content purely based on its merit, while authors remain unaware of who is evaluating their work.

Expert Reviewers

The peer reviewers for TechVista Journal of Emerging Information Systems are distinguished specialists in the fields of information systems, computer science, data analytics, software engineering, cybersecurity, and emerging technologies. Each reviewer brings a wealth of expertise supported by an extensive publication record in leading international journals within these domains. To further enrich the evaluation process, the editorial team may invite external reviewers with specialized knowledge in areas directly relevant to the submitted manuscripts. The reviewers’ profound understanding of both theoretical frameworks and practical applications ensures a meticulous and constructive assessment, fostering high-quality contributions to the evolving field of information systems and technology.

Feedback and Revision

After the peer review, authors receive detailed feedback from the reviewers. This feedback may include suggestions for improvements, clarifications, and critical insights to enhance the quality of the paper. Authors are expected to revise their manuscripts accordingly and resubmit them for final consideration.

Time and Effort

Producing a high-quality article is a time-consuming process. The TechVista Journal of Emerging Information Systems is committed to maintaining a robust peer review process that ensures only the most rigorous and impactful research is published. This dedication to excellence underscores the journal's reputation and its contribution to the academic community.